« Back to Articles Index

Managing Home Care fees

Managing Home Care fees

As we get older we may need help with our daily living activities. But remember that asking for help does not mean you will have to move out of your home. The government now subsidises more home care packages that might allow you to reduce the burden on your spouse and family but continue to receive the care you need in your own home.

For some people, a move into residential care with 24-hour support might be a more suitable option. However, the important thing to realise is that you have choices. You also need to understand what fees are payable and whether you have any opportunity to reduce the amount you pay for this help. This is where advice is important.

Before you can apply for a subsidised home care package you need to be approved by an Aged Care Assessment Team. You can find more information at www.myagedcare.gov.au

The fees for home care are in two components – a basic fee paid by all care recipients or an income-tested fee paid by care recipients who receive a part Centrelink/Veterans’ Affairs pension or are self-funded.

The fees applicable to September 19, 2017 are shown in the diagram below:

Basic fee

  • $10.10 per day (totals $3687 per year)
  • Indexed March 20 and September 20

Income-tested fee

  • 50 per cent of your income over certain thresholds
  • Up to $10,552 per year

Example

Alice lives at home with her husband and has been approved for a home care package. They are fully self-funded and do not qualify for any age pension. Together they have $80,000 a year of assessable income.

On her share of the income ($40,000) it is estimated that Alice will be asked to pay:

• basic fee – $3687 per year, plus

• care fee – $5916 per year.

Note: Each member of a couple (where both living at home) can have assessable income up to $20,339.80 before an income-tested care fee is payable.

When calculating the fees, assessable income includes payments received from Centrelink or Veterans’ Affairs as well as assessable income from assets and investments using Centrelink income test rules. For example, cash, term deposits and shares will be assessed under deeming rules.

If you are able to structure your investments in a way that reduces assessable income this may reduce the fees you will be asked to pay. But it is always important to review your full situation to ensure that sufficient cash flow can be generated and to determine the impact on your net wealth. For example, if the income-tested care fee is likely to be high, one strategy you may wish to seek advice on is setting up a discretionary family trust and gift money from your name into this trust. The trust can then invest this money into an insurance bond. This won’t change how much you have in assessable assets.

But the strategy may help to reduce assessable income that is calculated as the actual taxable income generated by the family trust. As long as you don’t make withdrawals from the bond within the first 10 years (or until death of the life insured) there is no taxable income for the trust.

Example

Alice seeks advice on how to structure investments to pay the additional expenses for home care. Her adviser recommends setting up a family trust and they transfer enough of their investments into the trust to reduce the income-tested care fee to nil. This reduces her fees by $5916 per year and she will now only pay the basic fee of $3687 per year.

In the first year, Alice will incur some expenses to set up the trust and investment strategy and for advice. She may also incur ongoing fees for reviews and operation of the trust. The insurance company pays tax at 30 per cent which may be higher than her personal tax rate but it is the after-tax return which is important to compare.

It is important for Alice and her husband to ensure this strategy leaves them enough cash flow (or cash reserves) to pay their living expenses because to make this strategy work, they are limited in their ability to make withdrawals from the family trust.

Alice and her husband also restructured their wills and estate planning due to this change in assets.

Note: This strategy may suit a person with high levels of assessable income. It could provide savings up to $10,552 per year by reducing the income-tested fees. This amount is per eligible person so savings could double if both members of a couple are accessing home care packages. The outcome depends on individual circumstances and advice is necessary.

Before making any changes to investments it was important for Alice and her husband to seek financial advice. The recommended strategy helped to reduce fees in the first year (and possibly a similar saving each year) but they needed to consider implications for cash flow, Centrelink or other concession cards, aged care fees, taxation and estate planning before making a decision.

Back to Top